Vonya Global announced today that the Final Report on the
The 2010 study is a follow up to a similar study conducted in 2008 and was designed to compare opinions in 4 areas:
1. Vision, Goals, and Objectives of Internal Audit
2. Mission and Value Relative to Strategic Risks
3. Process, Skills, Time, and Budget
4. Compliance Requirements
2. Mission and Value Relative to Strategic Risks
3. Process, Skills, Time, and Budget
4. Compliance Requirements
In 2008 it was revealed that a gap exists between Executive Management and Internal Auditors on the function of Internal Audit. The 2010 study set out to explore whether this gap still exists or if it has been closed. In addition, the new study provides a more detailed comparison between Executive Management and Internal Auditors.
While the 2010 Report on the
"We make understanding the strategic direction and goals a priority in our risk assessment process so that we can link our audit plan to the strategies and goals of the company.”
"Internal Audit is at the table for senior management discussions, for input on operational challenges and control risks, for the implementation of new systems and replacement of outdated processes, and for risk management.”
“The only risks that management should fear are the ones that they do not know about - it is Audit's job to provide that information.”
"Internal Audit is at the table for senior management discussions, for input on operational challenges and control risks, for the implementation of new systems and replacement of outdated processes, and for risk management.”
“The only risks that management should fear are the ones that they do not know about - it is Audit's job to provide that information.”
The full report can be downloaded by following the link on the Vonya Global home page.
No comments:
Post a Comment